Thursday, 05 January 2012 17:29

The Iran-Crude Waltzer

First the excerpt from latest news of today, then bits of analysis. 

"EU member states have agreed in principle to ban imports of Iranian crude oil to put pressure on the country over its nuclear programme. ... The US, which recently imposed fresh sanctions on Iran, welcomed the news. ... The Iranian state gets more than half of its revenue through the export of crude oil, says the BBC's James Reynolds. If Europe does stop buying, Iran will have to turn to countries in Asia to replace its lost trade, who will demand a discount, he adds."

It's an expected measure which possibly could turn effective, at least if other crude oil consumer markets will follow suit. Consider that China and Japan, South Korea will ban imports of crude oil from Iran. That's a far stretch. 

China is unlikely to ban Iranian oil. Their generals write books on asymmetrical warfare while a couple shipments of C4 mysteriously wind up in a bunch of insurgent hands in Afghanistan. China is more than happy to keep the US stuck on fighting in various countries.

Then take Sudan. Where the initially imposed sanctions aimed at government overturn. Suddenly China showed up in Sudan as a great investor in crude oil extraction and exploitation. Sudan is now selling all of its oil to China rather then to the West as it did before, and most of Sudan's oil industry is in the hands of the Chinese.

On the other hand, sanctions may just work their, err, "Chinese drop" effect by grounding the living standards in Iran and thus helping the case for more anti-government protests. At the end of the day, unemployment and starvation usually beat patriotic feelings down to mass revolt. It happened before in Iran, just not quite enough to reach a tipping point and cause an overthrow of Iran's leadership. "Sanctions on Iran right now are potentially quite effective because the Iranian government is stuck between a rock and a hard place, if they keep spending on their nuclear programme they'll have less money to placate the general population and face protests from greater numbers and with greater intensity."

Sanctions, together with subversion, are a better option than open war. To get out of this corner, Iran has to refactor crude extraction and export facilities, ports, etc. It shouldn't be a problem to increase their oil transportation infrastructure and boost oil production by installing more pumps -- only if Iran had the money and support of companies like BP, Exxon. Which is not the case.  

On the European continent, this could turn out as more bad news. The Eurozone financial crisis contributed to skyrocket fuel prices at the pumps. This geopolitical decision is most likely to be played by politicians and traders in order to justify more price hiking.

The US imports no crude oil from Iran whatsoever. So playing the Iranian oil card in the American economy is just nonsense. 

The EU nations import 8.5 million barrels a day. USA: 13.5. Japan: 5.5. China: 4.5. South Korea: 2.5. What if all of them will ban crude imports from Iran? 

"Japan is already one of Iran's biggest customers. Not long ago, Iran asked Japan to pay in Yens (which of course in hindsight seems incredibly wise, as the yen has almost doubled in value since then), one of the first really big oil contracts to be denominated in a currency other than dollars. Should be an interesting diplomacy game to see if Washington is even able to convince Japan to restrict Iranian oil imports..."

2012 looks anything but boring. 

 
Share on Myspace