Intro to the Paul Driessen Article
Paul Driessen is an expert on energy sources, and always presents well-reasoned writings to back up his positions - not wild claims of forthcoming doom to humanity and the earth that never materialize. He is "senior policy adviser for the Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow (CFACT), which is sponsoring the All Pain No Gain petition against global-warming hype."
He does not work for Big Oil. He does not work for Big Gas. He does not work for Big Coal.
The eco-maniacs hate him - obviously.
His points in this piece are widely unknown yet salient, and should be made known to all of society.
It's my view that those who oppose his reasoning do so either because they are benefitting financially from Big Wind, Solar, Global Warming research funds or they are so brainwashed they can't possibly go against the propaganda they have swallowed.
Notice too that these are true subsidies Driessen is speaking of for Big Wind, which are direct costs to the taxpayers of billions annually.
Katie Pavlich has written an excellent book that presents a preponderance of circumstantial evidence that Obama and Holder not only knew exactly what was going on with "Fast & Furious"; they ordered it for the purpose of justifying their itch to regulate gun dealers even moreso than the Feds already do.
Obama's history of memberships in anti-gun groups and statements that he would outlaw private ownership of guns are well known. Pavlich brings more of that to light.
Similar to the Global Warming Hoax and the Evolution Hoax, leftists who discover these are indeed hoaxes don't care one snip, because they follow the central edict of the father of all their ideologies: Karl Marx. For from materialistic atheism to a centralized government that has total control over the people all leftists succumb to Marx's creed: the end justifies any means it takes to get to that end. Warmers want to stop-by any means whatever-the use of any natural earth substances for energy: oil, gas, coal. Atheistic evolutionists want to secularize the world, and most especially the US. Neither cares what the route is that takes them to their goals.
In the case of gun ownership, anti-gun hacks such as Obama and Holder are exactly the same: they don't care how they get to the end of disallowing private gun ownership; they just want to get there.
In that light, it thus makes sense that they would smuggle weapons to Mexican Drug Cartels through US gun dealers believing their actions would remain secret. They then could expose that most weapons in Mexico came from US dealers and squall the same line the ATF and Justice Department have been promoting for years: that US gun dealers supply Mexican Drug Cartels with the majority of their weapons. Next, more regulation on or even elimination of US gun dealers. A right-brained, dream of a couple of goony utopian pariahs, indeed.
Now, is it not just like a character who, while in college, "sought out radical feminists and Marxist professors as friends" to think like that? Well, that's the kind of character we have running the nation. How the hell do we expect him to think? Like the local choir boy?
Knowing these facts makes Pavlich's circumstantial evidence much, much stronger.
Pavlich did not break the "Fast & Furious" scandal; Sharyl Attkinson did. And she caught hell for it from the Obamaites and other leftists in the media. The following article exposes that.
Freedom First & Forever: Berry Jingles
As I have noted many times, the current Warmers were once Freezers. Yet, for both cooling and warming, they predict the same doom for humans and the planet. They must expect us suckers to believe that the weather ought not wax and wane. Just as leftists want the government to restrict the ups and downs of a capitalist economy, I suppose they want it to try to restrict weather extremes-even though it's not possible.
"Billions of us will die from global warming and the few breeding pairs of people that survive will be [living] in the Arctic where the climate remains tolerable."
(Famous Warmer, James Lovelock, author of "The Gaia Hypothesis," who is now ostensibly writing a book retracting his "alarmist statements," because of the cooler weather around the world since 1998; the moron still believes in warming, but says it's just not happening as fast! What else?)
Tired of seeing NASA and GISS propound what is at best an unproven theory and at worst (in my view) at huge hoax, fifty astronauts at NASA (including four who traveled to the moon), engineers, and scientists have sent a letter to the space agency requesting that it stop including "unproven remarks" about global warming in its news releases and on its websites.
None of these people is backed by Big Oil or the Energy Industry. When leftist kooks throw that one at you (that anyone who does not believe in Global Warming is backed by Big Oil or the Energy Industry), be sure to point out to them the many commercials made by the Energy Industry and Big Oil stating their belief in Global Warming and informing what they're doing to stop it.
I suppose the eco-maniac Warmers will claim that Lovelock has been bought out by Big Oil when they read that he has said things like this: "The problem is we don't know what the climate is doing. We thought we knew 20 years ago. That led to some alarmist books-mine included-because it looked clear-cut, but it hasn't happened."
According to Live Science, a NASA spokesman confirmed that the agency received the letter.
Select excerpts from the letter:
a.. "We believe the claims by NASA and GISS, that man-made carbon dioxide is having a catastrophic impact on global climate change are not substantiated."
b.. "The unbridled advocacy of CO2 being the major cause of climate change is unbecoming of NASA's history of making an objective assessment of all available scientific data prior to making decisions or public statements."
c.. "We request that NASA refrain from including unproven and unsupported remarks in its future releases and websites on this subject."
d.. With hundreds of well-known climate scientists and tens of thousands of other scientists publicly declaring their disbelief in the catastrophic forecasts, coming particularly from the GISS leadership, it is clear that the science is NOT settled.
Entire Letter Here
The Truth about Climate Science from the IPCC
Though the main culprits in Climategate have been fired and the IPCC has lost all credibility, the group carried out an investigation of itself and, you could not possibly imagine this out of a bunch of creepy Leftists, they found themselves innocent of any purposeful fraud - though the leaked emails and the IPCC's actions over the years clearly the opposite.
Sure, they shut down weather stations in the coldest areas and left the ones open that were in the warmest areas. Still, they could not get the warming figures that their models predicted. What a lot of balderdash! It's not worth mentioning these creepy frauds, but many people out there have no idea of these facts; others, goofy eco-maniac Leftists remain steadfast Warmers, though they're really Climate Changers. Most at the top of the leftist heap don't care one way or the other about the climate; they seek to destroy America as it stands today-global warming and the rules and regulations that go with it are merely tools.
President Obama should look in a mirror and blame his inept Mideast policy. Of course President Bush could do the same.
The second reason gas prices are high is inept policy by central bankers around the globe, in particular the Fed. Liquidity did not go where central bankers are desperate for it to go (housing), instead it went into food, energy, and the stock market. The president and members of Congress blame speculators.
The third reason gas prices are so high is the US is in a constant state of war for 10 years. Iraq, Afghanistan, and next up Iran. The amount of jet fuel wasted in these endeavors is staggering, so is the amount of gasoline and diesel transporting troops to 140 countries around the globe.
Obama does not want to admit any of the above, so instead he blames the energy companies.
Read the rest at townhall.com
The most leftist of the three old Networks (which includes ABC & CBS), NBC News, apologizes for showing a very prejudicial edition of the Zimmerman/911 tapes. The original edition NBC showed was immediately picked up by the other Networks, cable channels, and FOX.
NBC News is the network that invented the new racial term-picked up quickly by the NY Times, Washington Post, the other Networks, and the cable channels-and obviously meant to stir racial fires: "White Puerto Rican." What else?
The edited tape made it look as though Zimmerman was following Martin only because he was Black. The original unedited tape shows that is not the case.
We here have no opinion at all in this case.
March 27, 2012 in Energies by EIA
The national average price of regular grade gasoline averaged $3.58 per gallon for the month of February 2012, representing a 37-cent (11.5%) increase compared to February 2011 and an historic high for the month of February in both real and nominal prices (see chart above). However, as a result of vehicle fuel economy improvements, costs-per-mile-driven are not at record highs. Further, gasoline prices vary significantly by region, with average prices on the West Coast almost $1 per gallon more expensive than those in the Rocky Mountains. The seasonally-high retail prices are mostly a result of global crude oil prices, which have also been at record levels for this time of year.