Saturday, 05 May 2012 12:33

Back When the Ominous

What else?


As I have noted many times, the current Warmers were once Freezers. Yet, for both cooling and warming, they predict the same doom for humans and the planet. They must expect us suckers to believe that the weather ought not wax and wane. Just as leftists want the government to restrict the ups and downs of a capitalist economy, I suppose they want it to try to restrict weather extremes-even though it's not possible.


These kooks have never been right! Don't forget that when you hear their gloomy predictions, purposely ominous to scare people and politicians into creating more government, with more rules and regulations to restrict the lives and freedoms of what the Warmer's see as the unwashed masses who must be controlled. 

Compared to many of the articles and statements regarding the coming "global freeze" (often called the "nuclear freeze" in the `60s and `70s), this article is very mild, though still quite threatening. 

Look at these five doomsday jewels, all stated about 42-years ago; they are more typical of the Changers' claims and predictions:

1) "Scientists have solid experimental and theoretical evidence to support the following predictions: In a decade, urban dwellers will have to wear gas masks to survive air pollution; by 1985 air pollution will have reduced the amount of sunlight reaching earth by one half." (Life Magazine, January 1970; this is all supposed to be due to "global freezing.")

2) "We are prospecting for the very last of our resources and using up the nonrenewable things many times faster than we are finding new ones." (Martin Litton, Sierra Club director, 1970)

3) "Air pollution bought about by the business industry is certainly going to take hundreds of thousands of lives in the next few years alone."  (Paul Ehrlich, an early Freezer and Overpopulation freak, and Al Gore's main mentor, 1970)

4) "Man must stop pollution and conserve his resources, not merely to enhance existence but to save the race from intolerable deterioration and possible extinction."  (New York Times editorial, May 3, 1970)

5) "It is already too late to avoid mass starvation." (Denis Hayes, Freezer, then Warmer, now Changer; Senator Gaylord Nelson chose him to be the chief organizer for the celebration of Lenin's birthday in 1970; as director of the Solar Energy Research Institute, 1979-1981, he was an early proponent of selling the feasibility of solar energy to the US. A great idea, sadly, solar power is in about the same viability and feasibility shape that it was in back in 1980. In 1999, Time Magazine named Hayes as "Hero of the Planet"; the Sierra Club has also awarded him its highest honors. One thing: these phonies give each other plenty of awards. To the dupes and fools they play to, honors, even self-given ones, provide them with credibility. Which-when one takes into account their wandering, error-ridden past-they need.) 

Having debated the Warmers many times over the years, you can see from these few crazy, failed predictions (and there are thousands more) why I have brutally belittled them-and still do. Knowing what their failed predictions are, the origin of their wild claims, how far off they've been, how they've changed their philosophy with the wind (and weather), all to restrict and/or eliminate the use of the earth's natural fuels, coal, gas, oil, certainly destroys any respect one might have for them. 

And so, I can honestly call them frauds and liars or either dupes and fools for positing the nonsense they espouse regarding the imminent demise of the planet, wildlife, plants, and humans, because of the use of the earth's natural fuels. For the frauds and liars know better and the dupes and fools are too lazy to research the origin and the history of the Changers' predictions and claims.

For the truth: Elmo Robbins


The Cooling World

From the April 28, 1975 (pg. 64) of Newsweek Magazine

There are ominous signs that the Earth's weather patterns have begun to change dramatically and that these changes may portend a drastic decline in food production - with serious political implications for just about every nation on Earth. The drop in food output could begin quite soon, perhaps only 10 years from now. The regions destined to feel its impact are the great wheat-producing lands of Canada and the U.S.S.R. in the North, along with a number of marginally self-sufficient tropical areas - parts of India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Indochina and Indonesia - where the growing season is dependent upon the rains brought by the monsoon. 

The evidence in support of these predictions has now begun to accumulate so massively that meteorologists are hard-pressed to keep up with it. In England, farmers have seen their growing season decline by about two weeks since 1950, with a resultant overall loss in grain production estimated at up to 100,000 tons annually. During the same time, the average temperature around the equator has risen by a fraction of a degree - a fraction that in some areas can mean drought and desolation. Last April, in the most devastating outbreak of tornadoes ever recorded, 148 twisters killed more than 300 people and caused half a billion dollars' worth of damage in 13 U.S. states.

To scientists, these seemingly disparate incidents represent the advance signs of fundamental changes in the world's weather. The central fact is that after three quarters of a century of extraordinarily mild conditions, the earth's climate seems to be cooling down. Meteorologists disagree about the cause and extent of the cooling trend, as well as over its specific impact on local weather conditions. But they are almost unanimous in the view that the trend will reduce agricultural productivity for the rest of the century. If the climatic change is as profound as some of the pessimists fear, the resulting famines could be catastrophic. "A major climatic change would force economic and social adjustments on a worldwide scale," warns a recent report by the National Academy of Sciences, "because the global patterns of food production and population that have evolved are implicitly dependent on the climate of the present century." 

A survey completed last year by Dr. Murray Mitchell of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration reveals a drop of half a degree in average ground temperatures in the Northern Hemisphere between 1945 and 1968. According to George Kukla of Columbia University, satellite photos indicated a sudden, large increase in Northern Hemisphere snow cover in the winter of 1971-72. And a study released last month by two NOAA scientists notes that the amount of sunshine reaching the ground in the continental U.S. diminished by 1.3% between 1964 and 1972. 

To the layman, the relatively small changes in temperature and sunshine can be highly misleading. Reid Bryson of the University of Wisconsin points out that the Earth's average temperature during the great Ice Ages was only about seven degrees lower than during its warmest eras - and that the present decline has taken the planet about a sixth of the way toward the Ice Age average. Others regard the cooling as a reversion to the "little ice age" conditions that brought bitter winters to much of Europe and northern America between 1600 and 1900 - years when the Thames used to freeze so solidly that Londoners roasted oxen on the ice and when iceboats sailed the Hudson River almost as far south as New York City. 

Just what causes the onset of major and minor ice ages remains a mystery. "Our knowledge of the mechanisms of climatic change is at least as fragmentary as our data," concedes the National Academy of Sciences report. "Not only are the basic scientific questions largely unanswered, but in many cases we do not yet know enough to pose the key questions." 

Meteorologists think that they can forecast the short-term results of the return to the norm of the last century. They begin by noting the slight drop in overall temperature that produces large numbers of pressure centers in the upper atmosphere. These break up the smooth flow of westerly winds over temperate areas. The stagnant air produced in this way causes an increase in extremes of local weather such as droughts, floods, extended dry spells, long freezes, delayed monsoons and even local temperature increases - all of which have a direct impact on food supplies. 

"The world's food-producing system," warns Dr. James D. McQuigg of NOAA's Center for Climatic and Environmental Assessment, "is much more sensitive to the weather variable than it was even five years ago." Furthermore, the growth of world population and creation of new national boundaries make it impossible for starving peoples to migrate from their devastated fields, as they did during past famines. 

Climatologists are pessimistic that political leaders will take any positive action to compensate for the climatic change, or even to allay its effects. They concede that some of the more spectacular solutions proposed, such as melting the Arctic ice cap by covering it with black soot or diverting arctic rivers, might create problems far greater than those they solve. 

But the scientists see few signs that government leaders anywhere are even prepared to take the simple measures of stockpiling food or of introducing the variables of climatic uncertainty into economic projections of future food supplies. The longer the planners delay, the more difficult will they find it to cope with climatic change once the results become grim reality. 

-PETER GWYNNE with bureau reports 

See Newsweek's 1975 Article, "The Cooling World," here:

Share on Myspace